Man-Made Global Warming Scam.
Wholesale Global Indoctrination on a Massive Scale
Pat Regan explains how the Scientific Community has fooled the peoples of the world.
question of alleged Man-Made Global Warming (MMGW) is highly divisive
to say the least. Like a vicious civil war, it regrettably sets good
friends and family against each other. In the following article I shall try to dispel a few popular
misconceptions in the sincere hope that greater understanding will
Firstly it is vitally important to clarify the crux of the argument; Is the earth's climate progressively changing due to natural causes or is it warming because of human activity?
Cultures on the whole are largely emotionally dependent on the
religious world-views that have created them. When we get down to
intimately analysing the psychology ‘behind’ MMGW beliefs, we soon
discover we are dealing with a subsidiary of biblical myth (end-time/
Three quarters of those who ‘believe’ in it have never identified or
acknowledged the big difference between MMGW and climate change. This
really is the vital crux of the matter. The ‘big difference’ I
highlight here has unfortunately caught out many good and caring folk
who have simply been unmindful to the major difference at hand!
The climate has always moved through dramatic cycles and some have
been more significant than others. Today we find folks in one area of
the planet crying out for drier weather, whilst others say: ‘please
send the rains this way as our land is parched and dying’. This summer
for instance is set to be the second wettest in the UK since records
began, according to the Met Office. It never seems to stop raining
here. Other lands though are seeing entire woodlands dry up and die. No
one is disputing that this is occurring!
Do We Live On A Doomed Planet?
The big question remains - is this a man-made
problem or is it the result of the planets natural evolution? If
it is the latter then nothing we can do will modify it because
Gaia/Mother Nature is
far too dominant, certainly far too commanding for science to find a
solution. People who place all their faith in the
great God of Science (like most people these days) hold onto
their sacred MMGW views like religious fundamentalists hold onto their
apocalyptic, Armageddon position. In effect, many Christians believe in
‘both’ theories of course and unite with the proposal that man is
ethically ‘accountable’ for the demise of the planet through MMGW by
his ‘sinful’ activities.
There is of course, an argument which says that
biblical prophecy of the destruction of the earth by fire which has
consistently been injected into the minds of nominal Christians makes
the idea of 'MMGW' somehow more unconsciously expected. By
believing in MMGW millions of Christians throughout the world are
confirming the accuracy, and validity of their particular religious
belief by having science confirm their worst fears. Of course,
old Satan gets the blame herein as
can be expected. The Horned fellow has misled mankind, they cry, into
destruction and this helps to support their messianic faith regarding
an anticipated Second Coming following a satanic fall… How ironic
this is when you consider that, with the man-made global warming model,
modern science which normally despises religion as superstitious
extraneous nonsense, is actually reinforcing the Christian world-view
and finding it a bulwark of support for MMGW ideas!
Many have become so indoctrinated into a wholesale dependence on
science that they have utterly missed the finer points of the debate.
They wrongly see science as the ‘Great Redeemer’ and the only solution to what they erroneously ‘think’ needs
fixing. They have swallowed the idea that intellect is somehow superior
to everything else hook, line and sinker! Science is widely perceived
as logical yet it invented the ‘Bomb’, which could annihilate the
planet in the first place and is far more dangerous than alleged MMGW.
Therefore, if the Bomb was invented by an allegedly rational force then
why do the globalwarmists consider science to be so well-judged in
essence when depending on it to save us from the spectre of MMGW?
The alarmists appear to think they know ‘better’ than the gods
themselves and place contemporary science ‘above’ the will and power of
the gods. This is typical human vanity brought about by reliance in the
indoctrinated credos of both monotheistic and scientific half-truths.
Sadly a subconscious ‘us against them’ mentality has been forged by the
alarmists. Anyone who dares to criticise the MMGM belief system is
instantly judged to be immoral and perceived as the blasphemous Bad
Guy. Nothing could be further from the truth however.
will change yet again when Nature wishes it to do so,
regardless of mankind’s fruitless hopes and fears. Mankind’s
subconscious guilt complex, over a naturally changing climate
phenomenon, will not modify what is occurring on a grand scale.
Humanity may wish it to be different but because we are puny in
contrast with the enormous natural forces which power the planet we
have to learn, to ‘adapt and improvise’ towards the new
situation at hand. Pretending science can do something about it
is a complete illusion but a nice bandwagon for unnecessary funding for
the hundreds of thousands of scientists being churned out by the
The earth, like the greater cosmos, is constantly changing and we
must learn to change too. We will never ‘ever’ have power over the
climate or the planet because we are typically reliant upon it for our
very survival. Science is deviant and supercilious in many instances.
Until the alarmists realise their thinking uses a bankrupt philosophy
they will never actually access the entire truth. In many ways this is
the core of the matter at hand.
I advocate care and respect for the ecosystem and have been happy to
defend it at all cost many times. I have also discovered that most
genuine new-age people realise that Nature is in control of the climate
(not man). Pseudo-scientific esoteric misinformation on Global warming has trapped many
otherwise first-class people in a deceptive world of guilt, wherein man
is generally considered to be immoral and a stain on the planet.
Yes agreed, humankind is most certainly not without blame when it
comes to outrageous commercial destruction of the environment for
profit - but individuals cannot be expected to change what cannot be
changed, via a wasteful reliance upon the God of Science.
The Latest Version of the Witchcraft Threat!
A growing body scientists are now expressing deep
concern over disproportionate claims concerning global warming
theories. Theories that are fast becoming the ‘Holy Crusade’ of numerous
scientists and politicians, perhaps seeking to extend their reputation
via ‘supposed’ ecological concern in public circles? It seems that
almost everything which goes wrong is somehow or somewhere blamed, by
shrewd politicians etc, on supposed Man-made Global Warming. It has become a huge
'Scapegoat entity’ in its own right. In fact it’s the new version of
erroneous, anciently-perceived witchcraft threats for whatever is
thought to be wrong within the environment; the new 'Bogey man' that's
coming to get us all unless we mend our wicked ways. Ways that are
suggested, adopted and then ‘controlled’ by those in power! Volcano, flood,
earthquake, forest fire - blame it all on our 'carbon emissions' and
get on your "bike" to save the planet!
With first-hand political experience I have actually seen the thin
veneer of deception behind the alleged concern of numerous devious
politicians. MMGW is a massive and widely accepted swindle that helps
to place these political movers into a better public perception. And
better perception equals one thing; more votes in the election booth!
Our politicians, who frequently accept
scientifically-unconfirmed theories as hard fact, tell us that we burn
fossil fuels, which discharge amplified levels of carbon dioxide - the
primary so-called 'Greenhouse' gas' into the atmosphere, causing the
atmosphere to heat up. They inform us this is global warming and that
it's largely our fault! YOUR FAULT!
A growing number of distinguished
are now however saying that this is utter gobbledygook, but as the
industry of Global Warming gets under way the more
'pessimistic' worldview gets majority support because it is a new
and lucrative global 'service industry'. MMGW, at least the contemporary
frightening, end-of-the-world alarmist description of it, is an ongoing
fable. It is an extremely well-coordinated falsehood that the
mind-controllers within society are ingeniously using to keep their
monopoly on us.
I feel that it is only a question of time until the cat
is out of the bag and the rest of the population finally wises up to
this mega-scam. I mean, how can politicians ridicule people who
believe in UFOs and yet spend BILLIONS of taxpayers money chasing the
phantom of Man-Made Global Warming?
David Bellamy says Man-Made Global Warming is simply Alarmism and I Agree With Him.
It may be worth considering earlier words presented by that most agreeable gentleman, 'Professor David Bellamy':
“To explain why I believe that global warming is largely a natural
phenomenon that has been with us for 13,000 years and probably isn't
causing us any harm anyway, we need to take heed of some basic facts of
botanical science. For a start, carbon dioxide is not the dreaded
killer greenhouse gas that the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro and
the subsequent Kyoto Protocol five years later cracked it up to be. It
is, in fact, the most important airborne fertiliser in the world, and
without it there would be no green plants at all. That is because, as
any schoolchild will tell you, plants take in carbon dioxide and water
and, with the help of a little sunshine, convert them into complex
carbon compounds - that we either eat, build with or just admire - and
oxygen, which just happens to keep the rest of the planet alive.
Increase the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, double it
even, and this would produce a rise in plant productivity. Call me a
biased old plant lover but that doesn't sound like much of a killer gas
to me. Hooray for global warming is what I say, and so do a lot of my
fellow scientists. Let me quote from a petition produced by the Oregon
Institute of Science and Medicine, which has been signed by over 18,000
scientists who are totally opposed to the Kyoto Protocol, which
committed the world's leading industrial nations to cut their
production of greenhouse gasses from fossil fuels. They say:
'Predictions of harmful climatic effects due to future increases in
minor greenhouse gasses like carbon dioxide are in error and do not
conform to experimental knowledge.' You couldn't get much plainer than
that. And yet we still have public figures such as Sir David King,
scientific adviser to Her Majesty's Government, making preposterous
statements such as 'by the end of this century, the only continent we
will be able to live on is Antarctica.' At the same time, he's joined
the bandwagon that blames just about everything on global warming,
regardless of the scientific evidence. For example, take the alarm
about rising sea levels around the south coast of England and
subsequent flooding along the region's rivers. According to Sir David,
global warming is largely to blame. But it isn't at all - it's down to
bad management of water catchments, building on flood plains and the
incontestable fact that the south of England is gradually sinking below
the waves. And that sinking is nothing to do with rising sea levels
caused by ice-caps melting. Instead, it is purely related to an
entirely natural warping of the Earth's crust, which could only be
reversed by sticking one of the enormously heavy ice-caps from past ice
ages back on top of Scotland. Ah, ice ages... those absolutely massive
changes in global climate that environmentalists don't like to talk
about because they provide such strong evidence that climate change is
an entirely natural phenomenon. It was round about the end of the last
ice age, some 13,000 years ago, that a global warming process did
undoubtedly begin. Not because of all those Stone age folk roasting
mammoth meat on fossil fuel camp fires but because of something called
the 'Milankovitch Cycles,' an entirely natural fact of planetary life
that depends on the tilt of the Earth's axis and its orbit around the
"The glaciers melted, the ice cap retreated and Stone Age man could
begin hunting again. But a couple of millennia later, it got very cold
again and everyone headed south. Then it warmed up so much that water
from melted ice filled the English Channel and we became an island. The
truth is that the climate has been yo-yo-ing up and down ever since.
Whereas it was warm enough for Romans to produce good wine in York, on
the other hand, King Canute had to dig up peat to warm his people. And
then it started getting warm again. Up and down, up and down - that is
how temperature and climate have always gone in the past and there is
no proof they are not still doing exactly the same thing now. In other
words, climate change is an entirely natural phenomenon, nothing to do
with the burning of fossil fuels. In fact, a recent scientific paper,
rather unenticingly titled 'Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentrations
Over The Last Glacial Termination,' proved it. It showed that increases
in temperature are responsible for increases in atmospheric carbon
dioxide levels, not the other way around.”
Other experts have voiced similar concern over climate alarmist theories too:
Meteorologist Likens Fear of Global Warming to 'Religious Belief:
An eminent meteorologist recently dismissed alarmist fears about
human induced global warming as nothing more than 'religious beliefs.'
"Do you believe in global warming? That is a religious question. So
is the second part: Are you a skeptic or a believer?" said
Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Richard Lindzen, in a
speech to about 100 people at the National Press Club in Washington,
"Essentially if whatever you are told is alleged to be supported by
'all scientists,' you don't have to understand [the issue] anymore. You
simply go back to treating it as a matter of religious belief," Lindzen
said. His speech was titled, "Climate Alarmism: The Misuse of
'Science'" and was sponsored by the free market George C. Marshall
Institute. Lindzen is a professor at MIT's Department of Earth,
Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences.
Patrick J. Michaels is the author of a new book "Meltdown: The
Predictable Distortion of Global Warming by Scientists, Politicians,
and the Media." He is an environmental sciences professor at the
University of Virginia who believes that claims of human-caused "global
warming" are scientifically unfounded. Michaels spoke with CNSNews.com
Thursday following a panel discussion sponsored by the libertarian Cato
Institute in Washington, D.C., where Michaels also serves as a senior
fellow in environmental studies. "John McCain, a Republican, has
probably held the most biased hearing of all," Michaels said. McCain is
a big proponent of limiting greenhouse gas emissions, which he believes
are causing "global warming." The Arizona senator also "is trying to
define himself as an environmental Republican, which he is going to use
to differentiate himself from his rivals for the (presidential)
nomination in 2008," according to Michaels.
A packed house
of staff and media heard on Capitol Hill about sea-level rise from Dr.
David Malmquist, Assistant Research Scientist at the Bermuda Biological
Station for Research. This scientific discussion sponsored by the
Cooler Heads Coalition clarified some of the mysteries of the sea. "Sea
level rise has been occurring for thousands of years and is explained
by natural processes," Dr. Malmquist observed. Claims that alleged
human-induced global warming will cause sea level rise to accelerate is
unfounded, he said. "Observations show that current accelerated rates
of sea level rise date back to the early 19th century and preceded any
substantial inputs of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere from the
The European Science And Environment Forum - a group of independent
scientists concerned about "premature certainty" on environmental
issues described the Greenhouse Effect as "a Political rather than a
scientific phenomenon" in their 1996 book, The Global Warming Debate.
Friis-Christensen and Lassen pointed out in the Journal of
Atmospheric & Terrestrial Physics that 83% of global temperature
variations since the 1500s can be accounted for by the solar cycle.
Eminent physicist, Nigel Calder, has written a book - The Manic Sun
- which challenges the idea that burning fossil fuels warms the planet.
Dr Piers Corbyn of Weather Action and the Southbank University wrote
a major article in the May edition of Weather Action. This began by
questioning the "conventional wisdom" of man made global warming which
were "clearly contradicted" by reliable satellite measurements. He said
that the fundamental assumptions behind GWT must be challenged.
Global warming has happened many times before cars and industry were
invented, and to higher degree than now. Climatologists agree that
during the period 9,000 BC - 5,000 BC global temperatures were over two
degrees warmer than now, while a team led by Prof. Shamesh of the
Weizmann Institute, Israel, has shown from lake sediments in Kenya that
there was another period of global warming between 350 BC and 450 AD.
Another point of interest is that Mother Nature produces far more
greenhouse gases than humans do. For instance, when the Mount Pinatubo
volcano erupted, within just a few hours it had thrown into the
atmosphere 30 million tonnes of sulphur dioxide, that’s almost twice as
much as all the factories, power plants and cars in the United States
do in an entire year. Oceans release 90 billion tonnes of carbon
dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, each year. Decomposing plants push
out another 90 billion tonnes, compared to just six billion tonnes a
year from man. 100 million years ago, there was six times as much
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as there is today, nonetheless the
temperature then was marginally cooler than it is today. Numerous
scientists have also concluded that carbon dioxide doesn't even
Incidentally, I covered much of this heated topic in my book ‘Dirty Politics’:
Supplementary care for the ecosystem is always urgently needed and
anyone who thinks otherwise is clearly either a fool or deranged in
some way. I realise that ‘Shooting the Messenger’ may seem like a good
idea to some, but I would be extremely negligent if I failed to speak
out against this most serious untruth My motives are principled and
always aligned to helping to preserve the fragile green spaces that all
species require to survive. That was why I started the focal point in
my own region called ‘Save Southport Greenbelt’.
I cannot however in good conscious stand by and watch mankind wander
into an epic failure like this without challenge! Wasting trillions of
dollar/pounds etc on fixing what ‘cannot’ be fixed (i.e. an ongoing
natural phenomenon) is totally reprehensible. Such massive resources
can build hospitals; feed the sick and grown crops to save the starving
masses. They can help our environmental agencies to prosecute
despicable polluters of our river systems and plant new woodlands for
the birds, etc. Adaption and improvisation to change is the key
along with greater education (not misleading propaganda) towards the
matter at hand.
UFO: The Search for Truth (2012, extended edition)
UK Paperback version:
US Paperback version:
Peter Swift and the Secret of Genounia
The New Pagan Handbook http://thenewpaganhandbook.jigsy.com/
Dirty Politics http://dirtypolitics.jigsy.com/
The Torch and the Spear http://www.amazon.co.uk/Torch-Spear-Patrick-Regan/dp/1898307725
(c) world copyright holdler: The Sub-culture Alternatives Freedom Foundation
(S.A.F.F.) Leeds, Yorkshire, U.K.